Spaceflight Insider

Opinion: What happened to Charlie Bolden?

With his recent comments the question on many space enthusiasts' minds is - what has happened to Charles Bolden? Photo Credit: Jason Rhian / SpaceFlight Insider

Major General Charles Frank Bolden, Jr. is one of NASA’s most accomplished astronauts. A former Marine Naval Aviator and test pilot, Bolden was selected as an astronaut in 1980. He served as astronaut safety officer and was the first astronaut to ride the slide wire escape system from the launch pad. Since he became NASA Administrator, Bolden’s comments have ventured into some…interesting territory and suggest that the man who rode fire to orbit – is not the same man we seem to be dealing with today.

Bolden is a veteran of four space shuttle flights. In January of 1986 served as the pilot of the shuttle Columbia on STS-61C. In April of 1990 he piloted the shuttle Discovery on STS-31 to an altitude of four hundred miles, where the Hubble Space Telescope was deployed. In March of 1992, Bolden commanded the shuttle Atlantis on STS-45. It was the first Spacelab mission dedicated to NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth, the precursor to the Earth Science Enterprise. Bolden’s last flight was STS-60 in February of 1994. He commanded Discovery  on the first Russian/American international space mission. During which, Russian cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev flew as mission specialist.

In 2009, Bolden was named NASA Administrator by President Barack Obama, but even before that he was thrust into the public eye. In 2007 the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Complex opened the Shuttle Launch Experience, a ride that simulates the sounds and sensations of the shuttle launch. Bolden serves as the virtual host of the experience, describing the shuttle system, the staging, the gravitational pull during liftoff and ascent, and at the end of the show promises “Maybe someday you’ll fly with us!”

Bolden has shown leadership and bravery as a shuttle pilot and commander - so why has he shown so little leadership as NASA Administrator? Photo Credit: James N. Brown / SpaceFlight Insider

Bolden has shown leadership and bravery as a shuttle pilot and commander – so why has he shown so little leadership as NASA Administrator? Photo Credit: James N. Brown / SpaceFlight Insider

Bolden was therefore already beloved and respected figure both inside and outside NASA when he was took over as Administrator, and many were pleased by the selection.

So . . . what happened?

Since 2010, Bolden’s tenure has been a study of bad management, foolish comments, demotivational decisions, malapropisms, and testimonies before Congress that have been downright silly. From one of the most acclaimed of NASA astronauts, Bolden’s star has fallen very far. So much so that he is almost universally loathed by the space community.

What went wrong?

Well, it’s not all Bolden’s fault. In February of 2010, President Obama shut down the Constellation Program for reasons which are still, if not entirely clear, then at least hotly debated. Bolden had no choice but to follow Presidential orders and terminate the program that was seven years and ten billion dollars along. Needless to say, the president’s wasteful decision – was also placed at Bolden’s feet.

Bolden's comments, in summary, is as follows: If NASA is denied access to the sole destination in LEO - NASA should cancel all of its crewed efforts beyond the orbit of Earth. Photo Credit: NASA

Bolden’s comments, in summary, are as follows: If NASA is denied access to the sole destination in LEO – NASA should cancel all of its crewed efforts beyond the orbit of Earth. Photo Credit: NASA

In the vacuum left by the loss of Constellation, Bolden tried to sell the new direction for NASA, but as there was no new direction, he faltered. In the aftermath of the cancellation, he delivered a speech that made many lofty promises, but offered nothing practical.

“The President has laid out a dynamic plan for NASA to invest in critical and transformative technologies,” Bolden said on February 1, 2010–the seventh anniversary of the Columbia disaster. “These will enable our path beyond low-Earth-orbit (LEO) through development of new launch and space transportation technologies, nimble construction technologies in orbit, and new operations capabilities. Imagine trips to Mars that take weeks instead of nearly a year; people fanning out across the inner Solar System, exploring the Moon, asteroids and Mars nearly simultaneously in a steady stream of firsts, and imagine this being done collaboratively with nations around the world.”

Well . . . yes, those things are easy to imagine. But where’s the rocket? Where’s the timeline? What’s the mission?

Constellation offered specific hardware–the Ares I rocket, the Ares V rocket, the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle, the Altair lunar lander. Constellation offered a specific timeline–first crewed Orion flight by 2025, first crewed return to the Moon by 2030. Bolden laid out no specifics, only a stream of “imagine”s.

Congress refused to abandon the Constellation Program entirely, voting to retain the Orion capsule, renamed the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, and ordered a new heavy-lift booster, the Space Launch System–which for some time Bolden refused to work on until Congress sent him a scathing letter reminding him that the SLS was “the law.”

In 2010 Bolden repeatedly justified the cancellation of the Constellation Program on the grounds that it was not properly funded. Specifically, he said, “The vision was great. The problem was we did not get the funding that would have been required to support that vision.” Yet in 2011, when asked what guarantee there was that the SLS would not be terminated by the next administration for budgetary reasons, he said, “I’m not sure that I said ending the Constellation Program was ‘purely budgetary’ because it wasn’t purely budgetary. If it were purely budgetary we’d be right back where we were real quick.”

If the U.S.' space program is to find its path, is to move forward and accomplish something - it cannot have a new program start and then be cancelled a few years later. Photo Credit: NASA

If the U.S.’ space program is to find its path, is to move forward and accomplish something – it cannot have a new program start and then be cancelled a few years later. Photo Credit: NASA

But in was on July 7, 2010 that Bolden made his most famous, most outrageous, and most widely lampooned statement from which even President Obama distanced himself: “When I became the NASA administrator–or before I became the NASA administrator—(President Obama) charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering.”

Bolden’s bizarre speeches, strange statements, and inexplicable behavior continue. Since the end of the shuttle program, the United States has been dependent on the Russian Soyuz for transportation of American astronauts to the International Space Station. This week Bolden testified before Congress about the danger of Russia freezing American astronauts out of access to the ISS.

Bolden said that if Russia were to do that, the ISS should be shut down, and he said, “I would go to the president and recommend we terminate SLS and Orion.”

Under the Obama Administration and his appointee, Charles Bolden, NASA has been rendered more irrelevant with each passing year. Photo Credit: Elliot Severn / SpaceFlight Insider

Under its current leadership, it is unclear if NASA will regain the ability to launch astronauts on its own. Photo Credit: Elliot Severn / SpaceFlight Insider

Although not as ridiculous as his comment about helping Muslims “feel good” about their contribution to science, Bolden’s statement about the ISS and SLS is even more insane, far more dangerous–and makes even less sense. SLS and Orion are designed for deep space exploration beyond LEO, where the ISS is a strictly LEO endeavor. It will be commercial crew vehicles such as SpaceX’s Dragon capsule that allow us to regain the ability to launch astronauts to the ISS. There is virtually no connection between the ISS and SLS. Why in the world would he want to shut down SLS and Orion if the ISS is closed down? The only conceivable answer is that he wants to shut down Orion and SLS anyway and is grasping for an excuse. Russia’s actions in the Ukraine have provided him with just such a reason.

Bolden’s behavior as NASA Administrator has been inexplicable. Other Administrators have done questionable things, but at least followed predictable patterns. Dan Goldin was a man of great vision who wished to explore the stars on small budgets. Sean O’Keefe was a businessman who sought to manage NASA responsibly. Mike Griffin was a supporter of Constellation and the Ares rockets.

Bolden? What is his vision, if any? He seems to just be muddling along, making a fool of himself while doing whatever Obama wants. When he offers something of his own, it either involves further destruction of our manned space flight capability or . . . just makes no sense at all.

Considering his Marine Corps background, his years as a test pilot, and his space flight experience, he cannot possibly be a stupid man. It’s also hard to believe anyone who has flown the space shuttle at a record 400-mile altitude can have no vision for the future of space flight. He obviously is a poor public speaker who easily stumbles into idiotic statements; he is not to be hated for that. However, his atrocious management of NASA is a hard to explain and a even harder to forgive.

So what happened to Charlie Bolden? Perhaps he is just a pilot, with a talent for flying spaceships, but no skill at running a large organization. Perhaps he’s overwhelmed by the task of running a sprawling space program with minimal funding. Or perhaps he’s just following orders; his consistently destructive recommendations to the President and Congress are not those of a man who wants the United States to excel, or even succeed, in space flight; they are the actions of a man who was placed in charge of an organization for the task of dismantling it–which is the one task at which he is excelling.


The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The SpaceFlight Group

Welcome to The Spaceflight Group! Be sure to follow us on Facebook: The Spaceflight Group as well as on Twitter at: @SpaceflightGrp






Collin R. Skocik has been captivated by space flight since the maiden flight of space shuttle Columbia in April of 1981. He frequently attends events hosted by the Astronaut Scholarship Foundation, and has met many astronauts in his experiences at Kennedy Space Center. He is a prolific author of science fiction as well as science and space-related articles. In addition to the Voyage Into the Unknown series, he has also written the short story collection The Future Lives!, the science fiction novel Dreams of the Stars, and the disaster novel The Sunburst Fire. His first print sale was Asteroid Eternia in Encounters magazine. When he is not writing, he provides closed-captioning for the hearing impaired. He lives in Atlantic Beach, Florida.

Reader Comments

EXCELLENT article Collin, but I hope that you understand the danger in speaking the truth. You are a braver man than I, now if you will excuse me, I’m off to put on my asbestos suit so as to withstand the firestorm of NewSpace napalm that is about to come your way.

Such an excellent article Collin! It’s so rare an opportunity these days to be able to read an objective analysis concerning the space program without resorting to the so tired anti-NASA rhetoric that is so prevalent today within the space community.

I really couldn’t believe what I was hearing, when I was watching Bolden’s recent testimany about the SLS. And it’s very regretable, cause he’s such a likeable man. I don’t think that NASA ever had such a dangerous, destructive and ill-advised leadership than this. I long for the day of the next US presidential elections, when the present-day leadership will be out of office, once and for all.


Outstanding piece- well written and true to the core.

Not sure you’re being fair to Charlie. I don’t think this position can do a whole lot anymore – This congress has tied the hands of any changes that don’t pass them and We haven’t had a President that really has had an interest in seeing that there was a directive that could be followed given the budgets that they’ve had. Bolden has been in a no win situation since he came in. Congress has never done anything other than treat this as a jobs program for the last several decades and it will take considerable efforts to change this. But, yes, Mr Bolden has not shown well as a diplomat or dynamic speaker.

Bolden is a very nice man and easy to like. So one does not like to criticize him. A management position is not his strength. Something like public relations would be.
Bolden like all NASA administrators is a political appointee. Then he has to follow the line set down by the White House – even when it doesn’t make much sense.

Bob Clark

Unfortunately, the speculation that he is just a good pilot is probably nearer the truth than any other explanation. He was selected for his current position by the president for reasons that will never be acknowledged, but the Peter principle is in full view. One can only hope the job will be filled with a capable, forward thinking leader sooner, rather than later, when it may be too late.

Having known Charlie as a colleague and friend I can safely say he is the singularly most dedicated and honorable person I have ever known. In spite of what is said here I can summarize what Charlie has done in one statement: NASA would be far worse off if he had not been the Administrator. The fact that Orion is even alive and heading for a test flight is due to his dedication to “doing the right thing.” Regardless of any opinions held by others those of us who are, or have been, true “insiders” know the real Charlie Bolden and owe him a debt of gratitude that can never be repaid.

Agree fully with most here, in particular with Robert Clark’s post. Be VERY clear that ‘Muslim world outreach’ was an Obama defined mandate. Poor Charlie was thrown under the bus by the WH, yes, fair enough, after his poorly chosen comments during an interview he should have never given while in Qatar. All in all, Charlie’s greatest downfall seems to be, he is too nice, too trusting and sadly, a mismatch for political world.

Bolden has had to walk a tight rope between a fickle congress & a white house with sometimes confusing goals. He’s had to dress up in his clown suit & perform for the circus. I would like to see someone else do even better in his position of ‘damned if you do & damned if you don’t.’

I don’t know why people let obama get away with this, he has ruined america, can’t wait till he is out of office. he has been the worst president in our history.

Space Man, lol, ruined America? That’s happening right now, with a Murdoch directed Narcissist President that is more unhinged everyday.

So, are those who vilified the tenure of former President Obama’s nominee actually happy with Charlie’s successor, Jim Bridenstine?…a Trump minion who has on multiple occasions questioned the veracity of climate change and has been more immersed in partisanship than he has in actual science?!? Any neutral observer knows that NASA should be run by a “space professional” and not a politician! How would YOU like to be one of the many highly skilled engineers and scientists working under a former hardline congressman with no proclivity for building consensus? After just 120 days on the job, Bridenstine is proving that his bruising seven-month confirmation fight might have been easier than the challenges he now faces!

⚠ Commenting Rules

Post Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *