Spaceflight Insider

Antares lights up Virginian night skies in return-to-flight OA-5 mission

An Orbital ATK Antares 230 rocket lifted off from Pad 0A at the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) at 7:45 p.m. EDT (23:45 GMT) on Monday, Oct. 17, 2016. Photo Credit: Mark Usciak / SpaceFlight Insider

An Orbital ATK Antares 230 rocket lifted off from Pad 0A at the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) at 7:45 p.m. EDT (23:45 GMT) on Monday, Oct. 17, 2016. Photo Credit: Mark Usciak / SpaceFlight Insider

WALLOPS ISLAND, Va. — As if saying “Enough!”, Orbital ATKs newly upgraded Antares 230 launch vehicle leaped off of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport’s Pad 0A at 7:45 p.m. EDT (23:45 GMT) on Monday, Oct. 17, and into the black Virginia night. The mission marked the pivotal return-to-flight for the medium-class launcher and heralded the arrival of new experiments to the International Space Station.

The S.S. Alan Poindexter will now travel to the orbiting lab, ferrying some 5,100 lbs (2,313 kg) of cargo, crew supplies, and experiments to the station’s Expedition 48 crew. The mission has been delayed for a variety of causes and was nearly pushed back again due to the pass of Hurricane Nicole over Bermuda on October 13. Bermuda is the location of a critical radar tracking station that would have monitored the mission as Antares pushed its payload out of Earth’s atmosphere.

Orbital ATK's upgraded Antares 230 rocket on the launch pad

Orbital ATK’s upgraded Antares 230 rocket required a ground support cable to be replaced before it could be launched on Monday, Oct. 17. Photo Credit: Mark Usciak / SpaceFlight Insider

These were just some of the obstacles that the launch team had to work to overcome in order to get the company’s sixth successful resupply run to the ISS underway.

Similarly to how SpaceX has upgraded its Falcon 9 family, Orbital ATK has evolved the Antares booster on each successive flight (Antares has evolved from the 110, 120 and 130 configurations to the 230). The Dulles, Virginia-based aerospace firm was already in the process of progressing to the Antares 230 when they were dealt a setback, (to the AJ26 rocket engines that earlier versions of the design employed).

On Oct. 28, 2014, the Orb-3 Antares/Cygnus was lost approximately 12 seconds into flight. The conflagration caused Orbital ATK to conduct the two flights after the Orb-3 accident on United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V 401 rockets from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station’s Space Launch Complex 41 in Florida.

The Antares 230 eschews Aerojet Rocketdyne’s 40-odd years old Russian-built AJ26 (NK-33) engines for the modern RD-181. Moving to these new engines appears to be a wise move as it was determined that a turbopump in one of the two AJ26 engines that powered the Orb-3 mission on its 12-second flight had caused the loss of the Antares 130 rocket, the Cygnus spacecraft it carried, and caused extensive damage to Pad 0A.

Aerojet Rocketdyne settled with Orbital ATK to the tune of $50 million and also agreed to purchase back the remaining 10 AJ26 engines it had sold to Orbital ATK.

With this issue behind them, Orbital ATK has been working to return Antares to service. Although there have been several delays due in large part to the needs of the customer (NASA), a technical issue with the rocket caused the launch to slide 24 hours to Oct. 14 – which placed it square in the sights of what was, at the time, Tropical Storm Nicole.

Upon review, the NASA range opted to push the flight to no-earlier-than Sunday, October 16. This allowed the agency to look at what damage Hurricane Nicole had caused. As it turned out, minimal harm had befallen the station and the countdown continued.

On October 16, Orbital ATK postponed the flight 24 hours due to a ground support equipment cable not performing as expected during the pre-launch check out.

“We have spares on hand and rework procedures are in process,” a spokesperson for Wallops Flight Facility said via an e-mail. “The Antares and Cygnus teams are not currently working any technical issues with the rocket or the spacecraft.”

Once the countdown reached zero, the two Russian-built RD-181 engines ignited and powered up to full throttle. About 3.6 seconds later, the launch latches released and the Antares 230 lifted skyward, lighting up the dark Virginia skies and leaping off the pad at an impressive rate of speed, the booster screeching out its defiance of gravity as it scorched a trail skyward.

After burning for about three-and-a-half minutes, the RD-181 engines cut out as planned and the first stage separated. At this point, the vehicle was 65 miles (104 kilometers) in altitude, traveling at 8,254 mph (13,284 km/h).

An Orbital ATK Antares 230 rocket lifted off from Pad 0A at the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) at 7:45 p.m. EDT (23:45 GMT) on Monday, Oct. 17, 2016. Photo Credit: Mark Usciak / SpaceFlight Insider

The S.S. Alan Poindexter Cygnus spacecraft is carrying some 5,100 lbs (2,313 kg) of cargo, crew supplies, and experiments to the ISS. Photo Credit: Mark Usciak / SpaceFlight Insider

The vehicle then coasted uphill for about 35 seconds before the fairing separated. Five seconds later, the interstage separated, clearing away from the Cygnus and the Castor 30XL solid motor second stage. Seven seconds after that, the solid motor ignited and burned for about three-and-a-half minutes.

Seven minutes, 5 seconds into the flight, the Castor 30XL motor burned out as expected. At this point, Cygnus was successfully placed into orbit – albeit in a slightly higher orbit than planned. Two minutes later, the cargo ship separated and moved away from the Antares second stage.

After an orbit of checking Cygnus’ onboard systems, it was finally time to deploy the two UltraFlex solar arrays. It took about 15 minutes for both to unfurl. With an appearance of a soda can that had suddenly sprouted two large ears, the spacecraft was ready to make its way to the orbiting lab.

If everything continues as it is currently planned, the S.S. Alan Poindexter is expected to arrive at the ISS on Sunday, Oct. 23. Upon being berthed to the station, the crew on board will carry out a series of checks to ensure the seal between the spacecraft and the station is tight before entering the vessel (the crew should be able to enter Cygnus about 25 hours after Cygnus arrives at the ISS).

The reason for the gap (between launch and Cygnus’ arrival) is to allow time for three new members of the Expedition 49 to launch in their Soyuz MS-02 spacecraft. They are scheduled to arrive at the ISS after 34 orbits, docking sometime on Friday. That will also give the crew a couple of days to get settled before Cygnus rendezvous with the outpost.

Once it has arrived at the ISS, the crew will utilize the robotic Canadarm2 to grab the cargo ship once it gets to a distance of about 33 feet (10 meters). Then teams on the ground will take control of the arm and move Cygnus to just below the Unity module and berth it to the Earth-facing port.

For one who has spent time on orbit herself, the importance of tonight’s launch simply cannot be overstated:

“Tonight’s launch was very significant to the crew on board the International Space Station, because not only will this cargo module bring them food, clothing, and spare parts for the system on board the space station, but, most importantly, science experiments so that they can continue the fantastic work they’re doing in a laboratory that is traveling 17,500 miles per hour over the Earth,” Kay Hire, a NASA astronaut on hand to witness tonight’s launch told SpaceFlight Insider.

NASA’s head offered little doubt for how much value he placed on Orbital ATK’s contribution to the continuing efforts to maintain operations on the ISS when NASA Administrator Charles Bolden stated that he could “…go to my grave happy that I know Dave Thompson [the president and CEO of Orbital ATK].”

The four-time space shuttle veteran also noted the importance of having an array of partners providing services to accomplish space exploration objectives.

“It’s great to see launches to the International Space Station happening again from the Virginia coast – and it shows what can be accomplished with a close partnership of federal and state agencies, along with the U.S. industry, all working together,” Bolden said via an agency-issued release.

This article is a collaborative effort between Bart Leahy, Derek Richardson, and Jason Rhian; it has been edited as of 5:00 p.m. EDT / 21:00 GMT to provide more and current information.

Video courtesy of NASA


SpaceFlight Insider is a space journal working to break the pattern of bias prevalent among other media outlets. Working off a budget acquired through sponsors and advertisers, SpaceFlight Insider has rapidly become one of the premier space news outlets currently in operation. SFI works almost exclusively with the assistance of volunteers.

Reader Comments

> The Antares 230 eschews Aerojet Rocketdyne’s 40-year-old AJ26 engines for the modern RD-181.

Well, RD-181 is a modification of the 30-year-old RD-170 engine.

“Aerojet Rocketdyne’s 40 Year old AJ26.” Say what? As I am sure the authors know the AJ26 is in fact the Russian Kuznetsov NK-33 that was modified by removing some electrical harnessing, adding U.S. electronics, qualifying it for U.S. propellants, and modifying the steering system. It was the Russian parts (turbo pumps) that failed. It is grossly misleading to suggest these were American Aerojet Rocketdyne rocket engines.

As Don Reba also mentions the “modern RD-181” is a modified version of the single chamber RD-191 that is itself a derivative of the four chamber RD-170 that was designed in the late 1970s. It is hardly modern.

I don’t recall us ever stating the information you noted was not true, in fact, we’ve mentioned on countless occasions the exact same data you attacked us over. Here are 10 stories we’ve published which cover the points you raised:

It’s not “grossly” or even “mildly” misleading and we don’t appreciate you adapting reality in an attempt to smear our work. The part of the Wikipedia post you conveniently opted to leave out from your description of the AJ26 reads as follows: “The NK-33s were imported from Russia to the United States, modified, and re-designated as Aerojet AJ26s.” In short, you failed to do any research as to what we’ve said about the AJ26/NK-33 in the past and then cherry-picked a Wikipedia post in order to accuse us of posting intentionally misleading content. This is totally unacceptable behavior.

SpaceFlight Insider has a zero tolerance policy (see our Commenting Rules below) toward those who adapt facts in order to forward an agenda (commonly referred to as trolls). This isn’t the first time you’ve behaved in this manner. The next time you choose to accuse someone of something – you’d be advised to get your facts straight and to not gerrymander what has been written to pull off such a deplorable stunt. As it stands, your comments are baseless and inexcusable. Further displays of troll behavior by you will result in you being permanently banned from posting comments.

As you have chosen to accuse us of misconduct in a public manner, I’ve opted to respond similarly. So those who read what you’ve said – can see immediately that your comments are, at best, ill-researched and, at worst, dishonest.

Jason Rhian – Editor, SpaceFlight Insider

…”leaping off the pad at an impressive rate, the booster screeching out its defiance of gravity as it scorched skyward…”


It took a long time, but it is a huge relief that this launch system is finally back in operation. New Space needs two clear competing, reasonably priced choices in launchers to form the base of the upcoming orbital resupply industry.

⚠ Commenting Rules

Post Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *